Producer Kevin Rothstein
The way Dr. Curtis Schondelmeyer sees it, the Lexington police officer talking on his cell phone was so distracted by the conversation he was having the officer wasnât paying enough attention to the rush hour traffic at the intersection of Bedford Street and an office park outlet.
As Schondelmeyer recalls, he raised his camera phone and snapped a picture, planning to send it to Lexington police as part of his complaint.
âHe was on his cell phone in his right hand, talking very animated on his cell phone, while trying to direct traffic out of the parking lot and also stop traffic on the four-lane road there,â Schondelmeyer told FOX Undercover reporter Mike Beaudet.
The officer noticed Schondelmeyer but didn't stop him, and Schondelmeyer went on his way, reporting the incident to Lexington police the next day.
A few days after that, he got a ticket in the mail charging him with impeded operation with a handheld device, a $40 ticket that could result in an insurance surcharge.
But there's one big problem with that, according to Schondelmeyer.
âI was not driving so I was upset with the fact that it was clearly you were so distracted on the cell phone you couldn't catch what was going on in the car,â he said.
Schondelmeyer's partner signed an affidavit, writing under the penalty of perjury that he, not Schondelmeyer, was the one behind the wheel. Schondelmeyer is going to court to fight the ticket, which in Schondelmeyerâs mind was âabsolutelyâ retaliation.
âThere is no doubt in my mind,â he said. âI donât understand it at all, except for the fact that he did not notice that somebody else was in the car with me because he was on the cell phone and did not see it.â
Schondelmeyer may also have to explain to the court the three surchargeable incidents on his driving record from last year, though he says they are irrelevant because he wasnât behind the wheel this time.
FOX Undercover reviewed Schondelmeyerâs complaint with Tom Shamshak, a former police chief in Winthrop and Spencer.
âThis should trigger an investigation of this officer's use of his cell phone on details,â Shamshak said.
âThis guy says he wasn't even driving when this happened. What does that tell you?â Beaudet asked him.
âIt says that this was not a thoroughly investigated incident,â Shamshak replied.
âIt has the stink of retaliation,â Beaudet said.
âIt does have a sense of retaliation because the officer did not take the time then and there to stop and find out the identity of who was actually driving. It was a knee jerk reaction,â Shamshak replied.
But Lexington police are standing by their officer.
âIn the officer's mind, he believed that person was operating the vehicle negligently. The operator of the vehicle was not paying attention,â Lexington police Capt. Manny Ferry told FOX Undercover in a phone interview.
Ferro said officers should not be using their phones while they are in the road unless itâs an emergency or a call from the police department. The call that Schondelmeyer witnessed was, according to Ferro, a call from the police department.
âWere we happy that the officer was cradling the phone on his shoulder while directing traffic, even though someone from the police station called him? No,â he said.
Lexington police have spoken to the officer but they're not planning to take any further action.
The captain insists the officer placed the call from the police department on hold while he was in the road, something Schondelmeyer says just isn't true.
âI donât care that there's a traffic detail out there. They're doing their job. I just think that people should be doing their job and they shouldnât be distracted, especially when there are motorists coming by and their own life is at stake out there,â he said.
© 2017 Cox Media Group.
Complaint over police cell phone use followed by citation, charge of retaliation
Was Montana's wild House race a Trump test? Not so much
Masked robber 'no amateur,' store owner says
US diplomat: China tightened border controls with N. Korea
Poll: Most older Americans want Medicare for long-term care